<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stuck in beta?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fronmark.com/2009/01/17/stuck-on-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fronmark.com/2009/01/17/stuck-on-beta/</link>
	<description>Web + Tech + Startups + Finance</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Martin Frönmark</title>
		<link>http://www.fronmark.com/2009/01/17/stuck-on-beta/#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Frönmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fronmark.com/?p=146#comment-103</guid>
		<description>That comment was thoughtful. I agree totally. About the might not be right from a consumer perspective. Basically I just think you shouldn't start selling anything until it is good enough.. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That comment was thoughtful. I agree totally. About the might not be right from a consumer perspective. Basically I just think you shouldn&#8217;t start selling anything until it is good enough.. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc-André</title>
		<link>http://www.fronmark.com/2009/01/17/stuck-on-beta/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc-André</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fronmark.com/?p=146#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Beta should have remained within organizations to deal with versions because I believe it goes way beyond works/doesn't work once you launch something online.

A feature/app might be working well from a technical point of view but what if it's not right from a consumer point of view? I don't think you'd be out of beta in that case.

Unlike all other platforms, online apps can not only be changed and adapted but they SHOULD be changed and adapted. It's a never ending beta. Feedback and comments nourish them so they can evolve to work well. Cut the "beta", the process is on-going and never ending.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beta should have remained within organizations to deal with versions because I believe it goes way beyond works/doesn&#8217;t work once you launch something online.</p>
<p>A feature/app might be working well from a technical point of view but what if it&#8217;s not right from a consumer point of view? I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d be out of beta in that case.</p>
<p>Unlike all other platforms, online apps can not only be changed and adapted but they SHOULD be changed and adapted. It&#8217;s a never ending beta. Feedback and comments nourish them so they can evolve to work well. Cut the &#8220;beta&#8221;, the process is on-going and never ending.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

